Biggest dick, fastest way to penis enlargement and boost of confidence

If you are like the thousands of other guys who visit my site every day then you are looking for a way to easily enlarge your dick. What's more you probably want achieve that bigger size as fast as possible so you can start enjoying the increased confidence straight away.

Well I have a product for you that allows you to do all of this and more. Introducing SizeGenetics, the clinically proven method of non-surgical penis enlargement. This medically backed device helps you:

    greentick Increase your penis length

    greentick Add inches to your penis girth

    greentick Reduce and remove that painful curvature

Furthermore the full SizeGenetics system gives you:

A clinically proven, medical type 1 device: Click here to find out more about SizeGenetics

For safe and permanent enlargement. Other cheaper devices are not clinically proven and this means you risk both your health and your money if you buy them. SizeGenetics has gone through many clinical trials and has been backed by doctors so you know it is not only safe but also incredibly effective.

Penis size by race and nationality

1) William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson's 1966 study was the first to address the "phallic fallacy", the mistaken belief that size increase during erection is proportional to flaccid length. In fact, they found that the variation in flaccid size is much larger than variation in erect size and small flaccid penises increase more in size that long flaccid penises. There are men (called "growers") who have a smaller flaccid penis size of for example 3.5" which grow to 6.5" erect, and also men (called "showers") who have a larger flaccid penis size of 5" which only grow 1" to 6" erect. Their average erect size estimate was 5.2".

2) Dr. Wessels published a study in the September 1996 Journal of Urology concluding that average erect length was 12.9 cm (5.08 in) and that "Neither patient age nor size of the flaccid penis accurately predicted erectile length." Almost 20% of the subjects had erect lengths of less than 4". This is the largest study that is the most modern and scientific. These studies showed no prediction of erect penis size as based on height, race, or size of hands/feet/flaccid penis size. Black, White, and Asian men were all compared, and no statistically significant difference was found among the races. Here's a few more often-cited studies (There are numerous studies that are actually surveys, on-line or otherwise. People tend to over-estimate their size on these surveys, as compared to studies where penis size is objectively and consistently measured, and so surveys should be taken with a grain of salt):

1) The classic penis size study is "Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male" by Alfred C. Kinsey, et al (1948), which had a sample size of 3,500 subjects. In this study, each participant was given a stamped postcard against which he would hold his erect penis, mark its length, and drop the postcard in the mail. As such, the participants never even handled a ruler. In this study, Kinsey found the average erect size to be 6.2".

2) Another study conducted by LifeStyles Condoms in 2001 found an average of 14.9 cm (5.9 in) with a standard deviation of 2.1 cm (0.8 in). This was measured by staff. The purpose of this study was to ensure properly sized condoms were available. 401 college students volunteered to be measured during 2001 Spring Break in CancĂșn, Mexico. However the sample may be more representative of male American college students visiting Cancun for spring break, and eager to have their penises measured, than it is of the entire male American population.

3) In an Italian study published in 2001 of 3,300 soldiers age 17-19, Ponchietti and his colleagues found the average stretched penis length (this is very close in length to the erect penis) to be 12.5 cm. or 4.92 in. The average erect penis size from these studies are 4.92-6.2" (actually the Kinsey study was really a survey as each subject measured his own penis at home instead of it being measured objectively in the lab, and so overexaggeration is possible). There was no correlation between size and race.